<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reproductive Partners Fertility Blog &#187; Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/category/education/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog</link>
	<description>Helping couples acheive the dream of being parents.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:06:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does IVF increase the chance of identical (monozygotic) twins?</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/429/does-ivf-increase-the-chance-of-identical-monozygotic-twins.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/429/does-ivf-increase-the-chance-of-identical-monozygotic-twins.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 21:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eSET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identical twins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monozygotic twins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single embryo transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It does, at least according to a study in the July 2010 issue of <a href="http://http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00634-7/abstract">Fertility &#38; Sterility</a>.</p>
<p>The authors surveyed 4976 clinical pregnancies from one large IVF center and found ninety-eight cases of monozygotic twins (MZTs) were diagnosed after first-trimester ultrasound evaluation (2% incidence). In naturally conceived pregnancies the incidence is about 0.25-0.5%.&#160;</p>
<p>The incidence in&#160;women transfering embryos from&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does, at least according to a study in the July 2010 issue of <a href="http://http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00634-7/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility</a>.</p>
<p>The authors surveyed 4976 clinical pregnancies from one large IVF center and found ninety-eight cases of monozygotic twins (MZTs) were diagnosed after first-trimester ultrasound evaluation (2% incidence). In naturally conceived pregnancies the incidence is about 0.25-0.5%.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The incidence in&nbsp;women transfering embryos from their own eggs was 1.7% but was 3.3% with donor eggs; however, younger women (&lt;35 years old) using their own eggs displayed a similar rate (3.1%) to women using donor eggs.</p>
<p>Eighty MZTs occurred after fresh day-5 transfer; only 14 followed fresh day-3 transfer (2.6% vs. 1.2%). The MZT incidence in day-3 transfers without assisted hatching was not different from those with hatching (1.3% vs. 1.1%). In addition, MZT incidence did not differ significantly whether or not ICSI was performed (2.4% vs. 2.0%). Four MZTs occurred after frozen-thawed embryo transfer (0.8% incidence).</p>
<p>The good news is that ninety-five percent of all placental arrangements were confirmed as having two amniotic sacs on obstetric ultrasounds, making them safer pregnancies than when both babies are in the same amniotic sac.</p>
<p>The take-home message is that this is a good reason for young women and those using eggs from a young donor to seriously consider elective single embryo transfer (eSET) so if a set of identical twins does occur and the other embryo implants one does not have to deal with a triplet pregnancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/429/does-ivf-increase-the-chance-of-identical-monozygotic-twins.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genetic screening for sperm donors</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/421/genetic-screening-for-sperm-donors.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/421/genetic-screening-for-sperm-donors.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RPMG News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counsyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cystic fibrosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PGD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preimplantation genetic diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm donors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tay-Sachs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to a&#160;survey of 26 sperm banks reported in the July 2010 edition of<a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00263-5/abstract"> Fertility and Sterility, </a>sperm banks vary considerably in their practices of genetic screening of donors.</p>
<p>Cystic fibrosis carrier screening, chromosome analyses, and hemoglobin evaluations are performed on the majority of sperm donor applicants. Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening is performed on most donors with Jewish heritage&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a&nbsp;survey of 26 sperm banks reported in the July 2010 edition of<a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00263-5/abstract"> Fertility and Sterility, </a>sperm banks vary considerably in their practices of genetic screening of donors.</p>
<p>Cystic fibrosis carrier screening, chromosome analyses, and hemoglobin evaluations are performed on the majority of sperm donor applicants. Tay-Sachs disease carrier screening is performed on most donors with Jewish heritage but there is significant variation in screening for other disorders .</p>
<p>Since the screening of sperm donors is not usually complete, we recommend that all of our patients do a fairly comprehensive screening of themselves or their partner (if they are using their partner&#39;s sperm) for recessive genetic diseases. We use <a href="https://www.counsyl.com/">Counsyl</a> screening which screens over 100 recessive diseases using a saliva specimen. Of course there are still some genetic diseases not covered such as the ones that are dominant and others that are not in Counsyl&#39;s panel. One still needs to rely on family history and ethnicity to determine if any other testing is needed.</p>
<p>We are fortunate that technology exists to determine if anyone is a carrier of an abnormal gene since we can now employ <a href="http://www.reproductivepartners.com/fertility-treatment/southern-california-pgd.html">preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene defects</a> to detect whether an embryo is affected before transfer, thus reducing the chance of a child with the genetic disease without needing to consider termination of a pregnancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/421/genetic-screening-for-sperm-donors.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prognosis is good for infertility patients after miscarriage in a spontaneous pregnancy</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/418/prognosis-is-good-for-infertility-patients-after-miscarriage-in-a-spontaneous-pregnancy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/418/prognosis-is-good-for-infertility-patients-after-miscarriage-in-a-spontaneous-pregnancy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscarriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subfertile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the most disappointing scenarios is when a couple who has tried to conceive for a long time miscarries their hard-fought-for pregnancy. A study reported in the July 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00752-3/abstract">Fertility &#38; Sterility </a>shows that the prognosis for a subsequent healthy pregnancy is good.</p>
<p>They looked at 5,663 subfertile couples, of which 1,098 (19%) conceived spontaneously. Among&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most disappointing scenarios is when a couple who has tried to conceive for a long time miscarries their hard-fought-for pregnancy. A study reported in the July 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00752-3/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility </a>shows that the prognosis for a subsequent healthy pregnancy is good.</p>
<p>They looked at 5,663 subfertile couples, of which 1,098 (19%) conceived spontaneously. Among these 1,098 couples, 199 (18%) miscarried . They were able to obtain follow-up for 171 couples, of which 95 conceived again within 24 months of follow-up. Of these 95 pregnancies, 86 (91%) were ongoing. The cumulative spontaneous ongoing pregnancy rate after 24 months was 70% . Keep in mind that these were couples who concieved even without treatment.</p>
<p>This is reassuring for subfertile couples who experience a treatment-independent pregnancy resulting in a miscarriage. They have very good prospects of a spontaneous ongoing pregnancy in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/418/prognosis-is-good-for-infertility-patients-after-miscarriage-in-a-spontaneous-pregnancy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If (insert name of actress or singer) can have a baby at (insert age over 42), why can&#8217;t I?</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/403/if-insert-name-of-actress-or-singer-can-have-a-baby-at-insert-age-over-42-why-cant-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/403/if-insert-name-of-actress-or-singer-can-have-a-baby-at-insert-age-over-42-why-cant-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced maternal age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby after 40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg donation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a question I am frequently asked.</p>
<p>In an article in the June 21st issue of the medical journal US Weekly, &#34;Baby After 40.&#34; they give examples of current and recent pregnancies as &#34;Hollywood&#39;s &#39;miracle&#39; moms beat the odds.&#34;</p>
<p>But can they beat the odds just because they are famous? I think not. For many of them the &#34;miracle&#34; is&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s a question I am frequently asked.</p>
<p>In an article in the June 21st issue of the medical journal US Weekly, &quot;Baby After 40.&quot; they give examples of current and recent pregnancies as &quot;Hollywood&#39;s &#39;miracle&#39; moms beat the odds.&quot;</p>
<p>But can they beat the odds just because they are famous? I think not. For many of them the &quot;miracle&quot; is egg donation but they are not willing to admit it. Just look at our age related <a href="http://www.reproductivepartners.com/ivf-success-rates/southern-california-ivf-success-rates.html">live birth success rates </a>&nbsp;for the last 5 years at above age 40 and contrast those with egg donation in the next column.</p>
<p>When you see a pregnancy above age 42 it could be a miracle that beat the odds, but more likely it&#39;s egg donation.</p>
<p>I wish some of these famous people would come clean and admit it&#39;s egg donation because they do other women a disservice by giving them unrealistic expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/403/if-insert-name-of-actress-or-singer-can-have-a-baby-at-insert-age-over-42-why-cant-i.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IVF or IUI for Women Over 40?</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/400/ivf-or-iui-for-women-over-40.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/400/ivf-or-iui-for-women-over-40.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced maternal age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age and fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertiltiy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Selection of a treatment method for women over 40 whose main limitiation in conceiving is their age can be difficult. If they are in the &#34;unexplained infertility&#34; group with open tubes, no significant gynecologic problems and a partner with normal sperm parameters the common choices are to try injectable fertility drugs (COH) with artificial insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selection of a treatment method for women over 40 whose main limitiation in conceiving is their age can be difficult. If they are in the &quot;unexplained infertility&quot; group with open tubes, no significant gynecologic problems and a partner with normal sperm parameters the common choices are to try injectable fertility drugs (COH) with artificial insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF). A recent study in <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)00430-0/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility </a>compared groups of women aged 38-39 with a group over 40.</p>
<p>The women who were 38&ndash;39 years old had an overall live birth rate of 6.1% per cycle, with no live births occurring after the second cycle, and women&nbsp; over 40 years old had an overall live birth rate of 2.0% per cycle, with all births occurring in the first cycle. These data suggest that the efficacy of COH/IUI cycles significantly decreases with age, but women aged 38&ndash;39 years had reasonable success during the first two cycles. However, for women aged&nbsp;over 40 years, no benefit after a single cycle of COH/IUI was observed. Women over 40 years should be considered for in vitro fertilization as the first choice or after one failed COH/IUI cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/400/ivf-or-iui-for-women-over-40.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How long to abstain before an IUI?</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/395/how-long-to-abstain-before-an-iui.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/395/how-long-to-abstain-before-an-iui.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 15:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally a two day period of abstinence has been recommended prior to ovulation or an IUI. A recent study in the March 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)02462-5/abstract">Fertility &#38; Sterility</a> suggests that shorter period of absintence results in better pregnancy rates. In this study an ejaculatory abstinence period of less than 2 days before IUI produced the highest pregnancy rates per&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally a two day period of abstinence has been recommended prior to ovulation or an IUI. A recent study in the March 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(09)02462-5/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility</a> suggests that shorter period of absintence results in better pregnancy rates. In this study an ejaculatory abstinence period of less than 2 days before IUI produced the highest pregnancy rates per cycle compared with longer intervals of ejaculatory abstinence. This higher conception rate occurred despite a lower total number of motile spermatozoa inseminated.</p>
<p>This may be explained by the observation that shorter periods of abstinence can result is less fragmentation in the DNA of the sperm. This is another demonstration of the fact the quality can be more important than quantity. It&#39;s important that those trying to conceive consult their doctors to determine the best period of abstinence in their case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/395/how-long-to-abstain-before-an-iui.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your sperm are what you eat</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/380/your-sperm-are-what-you-eat.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/380/your-sperm-are-what-you-eat.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omega-3 fatty acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s more evidence that a man&#39;s diet can not only affect his potency, but the quality of his sperm as well. In a study reported in <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412151827.htm">Science Daily</a>&#160;a&#160; little-known omega-3 may have implications for treating male infertility. In a study done in mice that lacked the gene responsible for an enzyme important in making the omega-3, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA),&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#39;s more evidence that a man&#39;s diet can not only affect his potency, but the quality of his sperm as well. In a study reported in <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412151827.htm">Science Daily</a>&nbsp;a&nbsp; little-known omega-3 may have implications for treating male infertility. In a study done in mice that lacked the gene responsible for an enzyme important in making the omega-3, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), male mice are basically infertile, But, when DHA was introduced into the diet, fertility was completely restored.</p>
<p>This is the first time that the importance of DHA to male fertility has been shown this directly, although some studies have suggested that male fertility patients with low sperm counts and less motile sperm tend to have low levels of this fatty acid.</p>
<p>The message here that may apply to humans is to make sure your intake of Omega-3 fatty acids is adequate. For more information and references see the <a href="http://www.reproductivepartners.com/fertility-education/lifestyle-fertility.html">Lifestyle and Fertility </a>pages on our website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/380/your-sperm-are-what-you-eat.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another factor that reduces IVF success-dirty air</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/377/another-factor-that-reduces-ivf-success-dirty-air.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/377/another-factor-that-reduces-ivf-success-dirty-air.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF success rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen dioxide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is so much one can&#39;t do when going through an IVF cycle; now you can add another, breathing. Dirty air, that is.</p>
<p>A study reported in <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412111631.htm">Science Daily </a>and published in Human Reproduction showed exposure to an increased level of air pollutants, especially nitrogen dioxide, has been associated with lower likelihoods of successful pregnancy among women undergoing in&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is so much one can&#39;t do when going through an IVF cycle; now you can add another, breathing. Dirty air, that is.</p>
<p>A study reported in <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100412111631.htm">Science Daily </a>and published in Human Reproduction showed exposure to an increased level of air pollutants, especially nitrogen dioxide, has been associated with lower likelihoods of successful pregnancy among women undergoing in vitro fertilization. They examined the outcomes of the first pregnancy attempt of 7,403 women undergoing IVF in Hershey, PA, Rockville, MD and New York, NY over a seven-year period from 2000 to 2007.</p>
<p>The main culprit appears to be nitrogen dioxide as higher nitrogen dioxide exposures consistently was associated with the lower success rate, regardless of which indictor was used &#8212; positive pregnancy test, clinically confirmed intrauterine pregnancy or live birth.</p>
<p>The answer to this is to have your IVF done in Redondo Beach or La Jolla, CA where the ocean breezes keep the air cleaner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/377/another-factor-that-reduces-ivf-success-dirty-air.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Length of storage of frozen embryos does not influence success</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/374/length-of-storage-of-frozen-embryos-does-not-influence-success.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/374/length-of-storage-of-frozen-embryos-does-not-influence-success.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duration of storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embryo cryopreservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frozen embryos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every couple who is fortunate enought to have extra embryos to freeze is concerned about how long they can remain in cryopreservation and still be able to create a healthy pregnancy. At Reproductive Partners our experience has convinced us that the time in the freezer does not significantly impact their chance of creating a successful, healthy pregnancy. Most of us&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every couple who is fortunate enought to have extra embryos to freeze is concerned about how long they can remain in cryopreservation and still be able to create a healthy pregnancy. At Reproductive Partners our experience has convinced us that the time in the freezer does not significantly impact their chance of creating a successful, healthy pregnancy. Most of us feel that the embryos can survive throughout the reproductive life of the female partner. As I recall we have had at least one successful pregnancy after embryos were frozen for 14 years. Now a study in the March 2010 edition of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(08)04122-8/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility </a>confirms our suspicions.</p>
<p class="ja50-ce-simple-para">They found that the length of storage time did not have a significant effect on postthaw survival for IVF or&nbsp;egg donation cycles. There was no significant impact of the duration of storage on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, implantation, or live birth rate, whether from IVF or oocyte donation cycles. The length of storage time or developmental stage at freezing were not predictive of embryo survival or pregnancy outcome. Only age of the patient at time of the freezing, survival proportion, and number of transferred embryos were positive predictors of pregnancy outcome.</p>
<p class="ja50-ce-simple-para">They concluded that cryostorage duration did not adversely affect postthaw survival or pregnancy outcome in IVF or oocyte donation patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/374/length-of-storage-of-frozen-embryos-does-not-influence-success.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diet matters in making sperm</title>
		<link>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/370/diet-matters-in-making-sperm.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/370/diet-matters-in-making-sperm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 21:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Arthur Wisot FACOG</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sperm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vitamins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have all had the experience of being told that we need to eat a good, balanced diet. Turns out that&#39;s true, at least in order to produce normal sperm.</p>
<p>A study in the March 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(08)04488-9/abstract">Fertility &#38; Sterility </a>examined the diets of 30 men with poor semen quality and 31 normospermic control subjects of couples attending&#160;a&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have all had the experience of being told that we need to eat a good, balanced diet. Turns out that&#39;s true, at least in order to produce normal sperm.</p>
<p>A study in the March 2010 issue of <a href="http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(08)04488-9/abstract">Fertility &amp; Sterility </a>examined the diets of 30 men with poor semen quality and 31 normospermic control subjects of couples attending&nbsp;a fertility clinic. They recorded dietary habits and nutrient consumption using a food frequency questionnaire. They found that control subjects had a significantly higher intake of carbohydrates, fiber, folate, vitamin C, and lycopene and lower intakes of proteins and total fat. Based on that they concluded that a low intake of antioxidant nutrients was associated with a poor semen quality.</p>
<p>RPMG&#39;s Dr. David Meldrum has a lot of information on the role of diet in male&nbsp;reproductive health on his website,<a href="http://www.erectile-function.com/erectile-function-lifechoices.htm"> Life Choices and Fertility</a><a href="http://www.lifechoicesandfertility.com">.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.reproductivepartners.com/blog/370/diet-matters-in-making-sperm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
