This is one of a series of news items from abstracts of studies presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine as complied by Dr. David Meldrum, Scientific Director of Reproductive Partners. We appreciate the enormous amount of work it takes to compile and comment on these abstracts.
To my way of thinking there is very little "natural" about an IVF cycle. People associate the word "natural" with something good and so "natural" cycle IVF has some appeal because it sounds better than the alternative which is, I guess, unnatual. Actually "natural" cycle IVF refers to doing an IVF cycle without fertility drugs. But it still requires hormones to start the release of the egg, egg retrieval under sedation or anesthesia, laboratory work to fertilize the egg and sustain the embryo, an embryo transfer, two days of bedrest and two weeks of hormones to sustain a possible pregnancy. Natural?
In a poster presentation 243 cases of "natural" cycle IVF were reported with hCG to start egg release given with estradiol levels over 150 and mean diameter over 15 mm. Mean age was 32. Pregnancy rate per retrieval was 22%.The retrieval rate was high at 88%, probably related to the smaller follicles. The results were surprisingly good and must be due to the young age of these patients.
If you contrast that 22% pregnancy rate with our 2010 results showing 63.7% pregnancy rate per transfer, it would take three "natural" cycles to achieve the same pregnancy rate. That's three retrievals, the most physically risky part of the procedure, and three laboratory charges, the inconvenience of six days of bedrest and three courses of pregnancy-sustaining hormones. More risk, inconvenience and expense to counter the low risk of hyperstimulation with the drugs and multiple pregnancy associated with conventional cycles, both of which can be minimized by careful stimulation and limited numbers of embryo transferred. That does not take into account the emotional impact of repeated failure.
Young patients are at the highest risk for multiple pregnancy and have the lowest financial resources. So if there is a place for "natural" cycle IVF it may have a place in such patients. But if you look at all aspects of a cycle, I think it is more prudent to use fertility drugs carefully, consider single embryo transfer or at the most two to maximize the chance of success.
I think it was the Green Bay Packer's legendary football coach who said, "Success isn't everything; it's the only thing." Or something like that.