Posts Tagged ‘Blastocyst’

Day 5 embryo biopsy for PGD or PGS less harmful to embryo than Day 3

Monday, October 24th, 2011

A study presented at the American Society of Reproductive Medicine Conference in Orlando last week, aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of embryo biopsies conducted for the purposes of screening for genetic disease at day 3 (cleavage stage) versus day 5 (blastocyst stage) of embryonic development. The impact that biopsy has on an embryo's ability to implant and develop into a baby had never previously been studied.

For twenty years, embryo biopsy for genetic disease screening prior to IVF transfer had been conducted on day 3, known as the cleavage stage, when only 6-8 cells have formed.. Day 3 biopsy involves removing 1-2 cells for testing. and removal of such a proportionately large percentage of the embryo reduces the embryo's chances of implantation.

More sophisticated techniques now allow biopsy on day 5, the blastocyst stage, when 200 or more cells are present.  The reason that day 5 biopsy does no apparent harm is that a dramatically smaller portion of the embryo is removed. Another reason is that the sample is taken from the outer layer of the embryo destined to form the placenta, called the trophectoderm (TE). The cells that form the baby are undisturbed, preserving the embryo's true potential.

Another advantage to the Day 5 biopsy is that a number of cells can be evaluated, reducing the chance for an error when one cell of an eight cell embryo may not reflect the remainder of the cells in an embryo, a phenomenon called mosaicism.

At Reproductive Partners we have been performing Day 5 biopsies for some time and find that it is a real advantage over Day 3 biopsies,

In embryo culture is more or less oxygen better?

Monday, February 14th, 2011

This is one of a series of news items from abstracts of studies presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine as complied by Dr. David Meldrum, Scientific Director of Reproductive Partners. We appreciate the enormous amount of work it takes to compile and comment on these abstracts.


In a poster presentation outcomes using 5% O2 and 21% O2 were compared. 5% O2 was associated with better embryos, higher blastocyst rate, more high quality embryos cryopreserved, and a higher implantation rate. Along with other studies and our own observation of more advanced embryos, over the last 10 years this single change in embryo culture at RPMG has given our patients an edge compared with other programs which were slow to make this change or have not yet modified their culture system. 

So with embryo culture, less is better.

RPMG studying financial incentives for eSET

Friday, October 30th, 2009

The LA Times article mentioned in the previous post shows the non-signficant difference in success rates between single- and double embryo transfers in a study from Sweden. Most impressive is the reduction in potentially complicated multiple pregnancies by transferring one embryo which should be an incentive for appropriate couples to select this option.

But in most of the U. S., couples are faced with more than the disappointment of a small increment  in the chance of a failed cycle. In most European countries, IVF is covered by the national health service so an additional cycle is less of a financial burden. In non-mandated states in the U.S, the couple is also faced with the cost of another fresh or frozen embryo cycle.

Our success rates in good prognosis patients who would be candidates to consider an eSET, our success rates are better than reported in the Swedish study and the difference in live birth rate between the two groups should be small.

In order to encourage couples to choose the single embryo option we are studying financial incentives to reduce the impact of a possible failed cycle which may not have occurred if two embryos had been transferred.

We would like to hear what financial incentive would help you choose a single embryo transfer if the difference in success rate was not statistically significant. You can post your responses to this blog.

Sex Ratio and Blastocyst Transfer

Monday, October 26th, 2009

One frequent question I hear is, "Does doing a blastocyst transfer increase my chance of having a boy." Urban legend has it that there is a greater chance of a boy with a blastocyst transfer because male embryos supposedly develop more quickly than females.

Now a study published in the October 2009 edition of "Fertility and Sterility" shows that "male embryos do not grow faster than female embryos in culture. Blastocyst transfer does not result in a sex-ratio imbalance in resulting offspring." This study from Australia followed the resuts of 435 blastocyst transfers and reached the conclusion that there is no increase in male births.
 

Blastocyst Transfer

Monday, January 30th, 2006

Blastocyst Transfer Update-2006 By David R. Meldrum, M. D., Gregory F. Rosen, M. D. and Bill Yee, M. D. Reproductive Partners Medical Group, Inc. Beverly Hills, Long Beach and Redondo Beach, California

Typically, embryos from in vitro fertilization are transferred back into a woman’s uterus at the 4- to 8-cell stage two to three days after egg retrieval. It has been customary to transfer more than 1 of these early developing embryos in order to maximize the chance of pregnancy. Unfortunately, this practice also increases the risk of multiple pregnancies, i.e. twins, triplets or more. (more…)