Posts Tagged ‘strict morphology’

What’s important in a semen analysis?

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

Many patients i see for the first time have had their initial fertility treatment decisions based on a semen analysis done at a regular medical reference lab. That's the same place that does your blood count, cholesterol and all the other medical tests that your general doctor orders. Their semen analysis consists of a check of semen volume, sperm concentration (count), motility (movement) and standard (WHO) morphology (an estimate of those normally shaped).

When reproductive labs do a semen analysis we do a more detailed examination of motility than reference labs generally do and, more importantly, look at strict (Kruger) morphology. Strict  morphology applies rigid criteria to call an immobilized, stained sperm perfectly normal. Normal values for strict morphology are in the 12-14% range while most reference labs use up to 80% as "normal." The difference is very important because we think that only perfectly shaped sperm are capable of fertilizing an egg.

The importance of performing a strict morphology in a semen analysis was emphasized in an article in the September 2010 issue of Fertility & Sterility. They contend that abnormal morphology by Kruger's strict criteria cannot be predicted reliably by the presence of other abnormal parameters on semen analysis. So even a normal count and motility along with a normal standard morphology does not assure that morphology by strict criteria will be normal. Many couples are lulled into a false sense of securrity and base their early treatment on the assumption that the male's morphology is normal, only to find that there are significant issues with his strict morphology when they fianlly come to have the semen analysis done at a reproductive lab. I see this scenario frequently.

I agree with this article's conclusion that assessment of Kruger morphology is a "necessary component of a complete semen analysis in the workup of the infertile couple." To this end we offer our referring OB/GYN's the opportunity of sending patients in their care to our lab for a truly complete semen analysis so that they have a better chance of getting the proper treatment earlier in their fertility journey.

All we need from a sperm is its DNA.

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

And its appearance is not a reflection of the DNA. That's what I've been telling couples when the male has severe abnormalities in his semen parameters. This especially applies to the appearance of the sperm (teratozoospermia), the strict morphology. Now a study in the March 2010 issue of Fertility & Sterility confirms the accuracy of my statement.

They looked at couples going through cycles of IVF with ICSI and correlated their outcomes with the degree of abnormality in the measurement of sperm appearance, the strict morphology. Fertilization rates were high (74%–77%), and clinical pregnancy rates ranged from 60% (subgroup with 0% normal sperm) to 56% (subgroup with ≥7% normal forms). The highest pregnancy and live birth rates were actually observed in eggs fertilized with sperm from specimens with the most severe teratozoospermia. The percentage of high-quality blastocysts was significantly greater in the severely teratozoospermic patients compared with patients with ≥5% normal sperm (37% vs. 28%). This is likely because in the lower morphology subgroups, female factors are less prevalent and the primary infertility problem is male factor.

So, according to this study,  those couples needing IVF with ICSI for severe teratozoospermia can rest assured that they do not have to worry that this abnormaility will adversly affect the outcome of their IVF cycles.