Documneted Success Rates
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2016 1:12 pm
Hello,
I am trying to figure out what the success rates mean between the SART, CDC and the Fertility Success Rates web-sites.
For instance, as I look at Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (CCRM), the three web-sites provide very different information women aged 41-42 using fresh eggs.
For CCRM, the SART web-site states the success rate as 32%, the CDC web-sites states success as 0/6* because less than 20 ART cycles, and the Fertility Success Rates web-site indicates success as a little under 20%, but not graphed because there were less than 20 transfers.
A similar question could be asked for Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center (MGH). The SART web-site indicates the success rate as 17%, the CDC web-site indicates the success rate as 14.9% and the Fertility Success Rates web-site states the success rate as 21.9%.
What are the differences in the success rates based upon? Is one web-site more reliable than another web-site? Is the variability due to the data collection time period? Or another reason?
I am trying to figure out what the success rates mean between the SART, CDC and the Fertility Success Rates web-sites.
For instance, as I look at Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine (CCRM), the three web-sites provide very different information women aged 41-42 using fresh eggs.
For CCRM, the SART web-site states the success rate as 32%, the CDC web-sites states success as 0/6* because less than 20 ART cycles, and the Fertility Success Rates web-site indicates success as a little under 20%, but not graphed because there were less than 20 transfers.
A similar question could be asked for Massachusetts General Hospital Fertility Center (MGH). The SART web-site indicates the success rate as 17%, the CDC web-site indicates the success rate as 14.9% and the Fertility Success Rates web-site states the success rate as 21.9%.
What are the differences in the success rates based upon? Is one web-site more reliable than another web-site? Is the variability due to the data collection time period? Or another reason?