Posts Tagged ‘frozen embryos’

Embryo freezing by vitrification improves frozen embryo cycle results

Monday, February 7th, 2011

This is one of a series of news items from abstracts of studies presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine as complied by Dr. David Meldrum, Scientific Director of Reproductive Partners. We appreciate the enormous amount of work it takes to compile and comment on these abstracts.


 whanEmbryo freezing by the newer method of vitrification is showing promise in improving the chance of success in frozen embryo cycles, according to two poster presentations.

In one, conventional freezing of poor quality day 3 embryos was compared to vitrification/warming. Embryo survival was higher, cell (blastomere) loss was lower, and pregnancy rate was 0% for conventional vs 6/11 (55%) in which vitrification was used. Of the 6 pregnancies, two aborted.  The authors suggested that vitrification allows consideration of cryopreserving poorer quality embryos. Further experience will be necessary to evaluate the miscarriage rate, because chromosome abnormalities (aneuploidy) is more common in lower quality day 3 embryos.

In another presentation, the implantation rate with cryoloop vitrification of day 3 embryos was the same as for blastocysts (over 200 cycles in each group, 26% and 25% respectively). This shows that vitrification of day 3 embryos is highly efficient considering that only 50% progress to blast. This finding might suggest beneficial in vivo co-culture and embryo-endometrial cross-talk effects that occur to a lesser degree with blast transfer. Alternatively, the lack of difference could have been due to low power.

The disposition of unused frozen embryos

Tuesday, October 19th, 2010

One difficult decision for many couples is how to dispose of unused frozen embryos once they have completed their families. This is true both for couples in which women are using their own eggs as well as those who use an egg donor.

A study reported in the October 2010 issue of Fertility & Sterility examines how both types of patient choose to deal with unused embryos in a private practice IVF center. A total of 1,262 patients using their own eggs had 5,417 embryos cryopreserved. A majority either used their embryos (39%) or continued storage (35%). Of 364 patients, who did not use their remaining 1,406 embryos, 77 (21%) donated 290 embryos to other infertile couples, 41 (11%) donated 160 embryos for research, and 246 (68%) discarded 956 embryos. In the same time period, 272 donor egg recipients had 1,233 embryos cryopreserved. A majority either used their embryos (40%) or continued storage (23%). Of 110 recipients that did not use their remaining 455 embryos, 62 (56%) donated 280 embryos to other infertile couples, 6 (6%) donated 31 embryos for research, and 42 (38%) discarded 144 embryos.

A higher proportion of patients using their own eggs ultimately used or stored their cryopreserved embryos for future reproduction compared with donor egg recipients. The interesting outcome is that egg donor recipients were much more likely to donate to other infertile couples and less likely to discard their remaining embryos compared with patients. I would guess that it's because the embryos created from donor eggs are not as strongly viewed as having a biological connection to the intended female parent and thus they feel more comfortable donating them to another couple.

How do fertility patients choose to dispose of unused embryos?

Wednesday, August 4th, 2010

IVF success rates have become so good that there are now many couples, especially those starting young, who find themselves with remaining frozen embryos after they have completed their family. Options for dealing with unused frozen embryos include discarding, donating them for research or donating them to another couple. Each ootion involves complex issues in making this difficult decision.

A survey in the July 2010 issue of Fertility & Sterility examined the choices made by parients at one fertility center. Of 149 patients from Washington University in St. Louis, 59% donated them to scientific research, 38% discarded, and 3% donated to a known or anonymous person/couple for attempted pregnancy. There was no significant difference in the choice selected between patients who achieved a pregnancy with delivery compared with those who did not.  In addition, the patient's age at retrieval and at the time of disposition as well as the total time in storage was not significantly different between patients electing to discard and those donating to research.

My experience at Reproductive Partners is that most couples avoid making this difficult decision and just keep their embryos frozen indefinitely. For highly successful couples the optiion of donating to another couple who has exhausted their options is a a way of giving something back when they have been so fortunate. But, as we can all understand, it can be difficult to have one's biologic offspring out there without having any knowledge or control of their future.

A few years ago there was an estimate of 400,000 frozen embryos in IVF centers throughout the United States, lending credability to the difficuty in making a decision to release them.

Length of storage of frozen embryos does not influence success

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Every couple who is fortunate enought to have extra embryos to freeze is concerned about how long they can remain in cryopreservation and still be able to create a healthy pregnancy. At Reproductive Partners our experience has convinced us that the time in the freezer does not significantly impact their chance of creating a successful, healthy pregnancy. Most of us feel that the embryos can survive throughout the reproductive life of the female partner. As I recall we have had at least one successful pregnancy after embryos were frozen for 14 years. Now a study in the March 2010 edition of Fertility & Sterility confirms our suspicions.

They found that the length of storage time did not have a significant effect on postthaw survival for IVF or egg donation cycles. There was no significant impact of the duration of storage on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, implantation, or live birth rate, whether from IVF or oocyte donation cycles. The length of storage time or developmental stage at freezing were not predictive of embryo survival or pregnancy outcome. Only age of the patient at time of the freezing, survival proportion, and number of transferred embryos were positive predictors of pregnancy outcome.

They concluded that cryostorage duration did not adversely affect postthaw survival or pregnancy outcome in IVF or oocyte donation patients.